- From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:04:57 -0400
- To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 01:05:26 UTC
Hi, Reading Paul/Luc's definition for isGeneratedBy: "Generation represents the creation of a new identifiable characterized entity by an identifiable activity." can we interpret that "identifiable activity" is same as "process execution"? If yes, then we should use "process execution" directly instead of using its definition (description?). Thanks. Best, Satya On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>wrote: > can we just state upfront that assertions can only be made about > > - C-entities that are identifiable > - activities that are identifiable > > -Paolo > > > > On 7/25/11 8:45 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > >> I suppose that if we follow this argument thoroughly, we should write: >> >> "Generation represents the creation of a new identifiable characterized >> entity by an identifiable activity." >> >> (We also have to do the same with Use ...) >> >> Definitions are becoming quite heavy ... thoughts? >> >> Luc >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 01:05:26 UTC