Re: PROV-ISSUE-39 (generation-identifiable-activity): Generation should be defined as an identifable activity [Conceptual Model] from Paolo Missier on 2011-07-25 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2011)

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:39:09 +0100
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4E2D63ED.5030808@ncl.ac.uk>

can we just state upfront that assertions can only be made about

- C-entities that are identifiable
- activities that are identifiable

-Paolo


  On 7/25/11 8:45 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> I suppose that if we follow this argument thoroughly, we should write:
>
> "Generation represents the creation of a new identifiable characterized entity by an identifiable activity."
>
> (We also have to do the same with Use ...)
>
> Definitions are becoming quite heavy ... thoughts?
>
> Luc
>

Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 12:39:36 UTC