- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:34:47 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|f89b404f7948c6267cd24efeaca593c0n6A8Yp08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E1AA797>
Hi Khalid On page [1], we replaced "if" by "only if". So the condition is necessary, and not sufficient. In other words, "IVP of" must be asserted, and cannot be inferred. I think it has always been the intent. Luc [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1ConceptDefinitions On 07/08/2011 04:01 PM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > > During the F2F meeting, there was a discussion in the second day > regarding "IVP of". The definition that was suggested during the F2F > can be found in [1]. In my opinion, the definition of "IVP of" should > be simplified. Specifically, I would prefer a definition that states > that "IVP of" is an asserted relationship between two entity states. I > list in what follows the reasons: > > (i) In the definition of "IVP of" [1], the conditions on the > properties of the two entity states A and B (i.e., that the properties > the entity states share must have corresponding values, and that some > mutable properties of A correspond to some immutable properties of B), > are not enough in order to infer that B is an IVP of A. This is > because there is a third condition that is not included, because it is > hard to formally specify, viz. A and B are consistent. > > (ii) A consequence of (i), is that we will not be able to > automatically infer that an entity state B is an IVP of another entity > state B. All we can safely do, is identify cases in which an entity > state B cannot be an IVP of another entity state of A. > > (iii) Even if we find a means for formally specifying that two entity > states A and B are consistent, e.g., using assertions, it will be > difficult to use the definition of IVP of to make inference. This is > because the definition of IVP of requires correspondences between the > properties of two entity states to be specified. These correspondences > can be complex many-to-many mappings that may turn out to be hard to > encode using existing semantic web technologies. > > Thanks, khalid > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 11 July 2011 07:35:21 UTC