- From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:43:22 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Not being at the meeting (wish I could be!), it is not clear whether this represents a shift in thinking about things and invariant views or perspectives on things or not. I think a critical aspect of going away from the word state was that I don't think we are talking about states - a file is not a state of a document whereas it could be a view/perspective of a document, e.g. something in a different ontology that shares state/real stuff with the first thing. Does this issue represent a shift back towards a model based on states? Or is it just shorthand for needing to describe when two things are views/perspectives of something? Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-prov-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:34 PM > To: public-prov-wg@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to > the same entity > > > ISSUE-28: We need a mechanism to assert two entity states refer to the same > entity > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/28 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 19:45:03 UTC