- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:18:06 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAtgn=SqaakiVrb1XNQsY=pemzJwRvM4MpnCZKsD4hOZ2xr8Wg@mail.gmail.com>
We could mark them as "secondary" relations that can be expressed using inverse properties. This interferes with qualified events/milestones/actions, though, when expressing this in PROV-O... Jim On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Garijo < dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi Paul, > I think that all of us got the mail. At least I did :) > It is curious, because we had some discussions about the prov:generated in > the prov-o group. > We didn't include it in the ontology because it allowed activities > "pointing to the future", and some > people disagreed with that. > > Best, > Daniel > > > 2011/12/14 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > >> Do we all get these comments? Or just the chairs? >> >> Interesting comments by the way.., >> >> Paul >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *Resent-From:* <p.t.groth@vu.nl> >> *From:* James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> >> *Date:* December 14, 2011 19:33:01 GMT+01:00 >> *To:* "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org> >> *Subject:* *Contributions and Supersedes* >> >> Hello, >> >> I am the author of the AliBaba auditing ontology[1] and I would like to >> seem more relationships from Activities defined in the POV ontology. >> >> >> prov:generated rdfs:domain prov:Activity; rdfs:range prov:Entity. >> >> An inverse of prov:wasGeneratedBy would be very useful in cases when the >> activity itself has a stronger identity than the entity created. Such a >> case would be when the entity produced is not identified by a URI. >> Perhaps the entity produced is a triple or a set of triples (g-snap) >> without an explicit identifier. Such a relationship would also allow >> someone using Linked Data to follow their nose between activities and >> the entities their produced. >> >> >> prov:contributedTo rdfs:domain prov:Activity; rdfs:range prov:Entity. >> >> In some cases it may not be possible (or desirable) to uniquely identify >> every entity revision. Instead a single entity may actually have been >> generated, in part, by multiple activities over time. In this case it >> may be desirable to have a relationships that is weaker than >> prov:generated and allows multiple contributions. >> >> >> prov:supersedes rdfs:domain prov:Activity; rdfs:range prov:Activity. >> >> The prov:wasDerivedFrom is useful to link new versions of an entity to >> its predecessor, however, it would be equally useful to link their >> activities together as well. A sub property of prov:wasInformedBy that >> implies this activity makes an entity, generated from this another >> activity, obsolete. >> >> >> Thanks, >> James >> >> [1] >> http://www.openrdf.org/doc/alibaba/2.0-beta14/owldocs/auditing-ontology.html >> >> >> > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 20:21:26 UTC