- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:02:38 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAExK0Df3AOZQOy0vh-3HpXg2qni0i34Q+zyhSqa=H4zhb54bwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Paul, I think that all of us got the mail. At least I did :) It is curious, because we had some discussions about the prov:generated in the prov-o group. We didn't include it in the ontology because it allowed activities "pointing to the future", and some people disagreed with that. Best, Daniel 2011/12/14 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > Do we all get these comments? Or just the chairs? > > Interesting comments by the way.., > > Paul > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *Resent-From:* <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > *From:* James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> > *Date:* December 14, 2011 19:33:01 GMT+01:00 > *To:* "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org> > *Subject:* *Contributions and Supersedes* > > Hello, > > I am the author of the AliBaba auditing ontology[1] and I would like to > seem more relationships from Activities defined in the POV ontology. > > > prov:generated rdfs:domain prov:Activity; rdfs:range prov:Entity. > > An inverse of prov:wasGeneratedBy would be very useful in cases when the > activity itself has a stronger identity than the entity created. Such a > case would be when the entity produced is not identified by a URI. > Perhaps the entity produced is a triple or a set of triples (g-snap) > without an explicit identifier. Such a relationship would also allow > someone using Linked Data to follow their nose between activities and > the entities their produced. > > > prov:contributedTo rdfs:domain prov:Activity; rdfs:range prov:Entity. > > In some cases it may not be possible (or desirable) to uniquely identify > every entity revision. Instead a single entity may actually have been > generated, in part, by multiple activities over time. In this case it > may be desirable to have a relationships that is weaker than > prov:generated and allows multiple contributions. > > > prov:supersedes rdfs:domain prov:Activity; rdfs:range prov:Activity. > > The prov:wasDerivedFrom is useful to link new versions of an entity to > its predecessor, however, it would be equally useful to link their > activities together as well. A sub property of prov:wasInformedBy that > implies this activity makes an entity, generated from this another > activity, obsolete. > > > Thanks, > James > > [1] > http://www.openrdf.org/doc/alibaba/2.0-beta14/owldocs/auditing-ontology.html > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 20:03:16 UTC