Hi Paulo, In the absence of response, I conclude neither you nor somebody else is interested in this issue, and I close it. Regards, Luc On 30/11/11 12:36, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Paulo, > > In the context of this issue raised by you, my September message > remains unanswered. > This may be an interesting idea, but I don't see an appetite for this > taxonomy in the prov-dm model. > I am proposing to close this issue pending review. > > Regards, > Luc > > On 09/23/2011 01:08 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> Hi Paulo, >> >> You raised issue-23. Is this still relevant? >> >> You say: " There are variants of Use that can be considered, and a >> taxonomy for them should be proposed." >> >> Can you propose a taxonomy, based on your experience? >> >> Also, would these extensions be generic (and therefore in the data >> model) or would they be domain >> specific? >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> On 06/07/2011 22:33, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/23 >>> >>> Raised by: >>> On product: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 22:57:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC