- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:24:34 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Satya, On 12/07/2011 02:15 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-196: Section 5.3.4 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/196 > > Raised by: Satya Sahoo > On product: > > Hi, > The following are my comments for Section 5.3.4 of the PROV-DM (as on Dec 5): > > Section 5.3.4: > 1. "See Section Note for a discussion of the difference between note attributes and other records attributes." > > Comment: As discussed earlier, the current description does not clarify the distinction between note and other other record attributes. > > 2. "..that the icon (an application specific way of rendering provenance) is doc.png." and "note(n2,[ex:style="dotted"])" > > Comment: It is not clear why the above two attribute-value pairs cannot be part of the entity and used records respectively. What is the extra information being captured by creating a separate note record? > For instance, a document was generated e.g. in 2010. In 2011, I query and visualize its provenance. I republish the provenance, with visualization annotations, so that others can visualize it the way I did. The visualization attributes ex:style/ex:icon are not attributes of the document produced in 2010. Luc > Thanks. > > Best, > Satya > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 10:25:14 UTC