- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:33:13 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
OK, I accept the change for the next round. The issue remains open. #g -- On 03/12/2011 00:34, Timothy Lebo wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > >> >> >> On 23/11/2011 15:42, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> >>> PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/166 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: >>> >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html >>> >>> "sufficient should be returned to enable a client application to walk the provenance graph" >>> >>> Some noun is missing after "sufficient" >> >> I read that as an implicit reference to the "provenance information" in the preceding clause. >> >> E.g. "I shall bring you some milk if we have sufficient at home". >> >> Does this create a problem of understanding, or is it a stylistic thing? > > > I did not raise it as a stylistic thing. > I created the issue because this American English speaker had troubles understanding it. > > Would you object to "sufficient portions should be returned "? > > If it stands as is, I will not object. > > Regards, > Tim > >
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 15:01:54 UTC