- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:26:31 +0000
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Stian, Thanks for pointing this out. Datatype is now a qualified name, as illustrated in the examples. Luc On 12/01/2011 02:17 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:39, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > >>> In the PROV-ASN syntax: >>> >>>> typedLiteral ::= quotedString %% datatype >>>> datatype ::= IRI >>>> IRI ::= an IRI compatible with production IRI in [IRI] >>>> >>> However most examples here and elsewhere in the document use QNames or >>> CURIEs for the datatype - which are not covered by [IRI]: >>> >> I don't follow you, what do you mean not covered by IRI? >> > prov:blah is not an IRI - although it might look like one - it's a QName. > > The syntax defined does not allow QNames as the datatype - but that's > what is used. Perhaps it should only specify datatype as a QName > instead? > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 11:27:06 UTC