RE: PROV-O and BFO from Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) on 2019-12-08 (public-prov-comments@w3.org from December 2019)

From: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 20:48:04 +0000
To: "pgroth@gmail.com" <pgroth@gmail.com>, Nicholas Car <nicholas.car@surroundaustralia.com>
CC: W3C Prov <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ME2PR01MB5362900FFAD7EE639B2C60F488590@ME2PR01MB5362.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>

prov:Entity rdfs:subClassOf bfo:Continuant .
prov:Activity rdfs:subClassOf bfo:Occurrent .

Done.

😉

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 9 December, 2019 07:42
To: Nicholas Car <nicholas.car@surroundaustralia.com>
Cc: W3C Prov <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
Subject: Re: PROV-O and BFO

Hi Nick,

Not that I've heard off. Would be interesting to hear otherwise.

Paul

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:33 PM Nicholas Car <nicholas.car@surroundaustralia.com<mailto:nicholas.car@surroundaustralia.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

Is it true that there is a potential revision of PROV-O being considered to better align with BFO, the Basic Formal Ontology? I have heard this claimed by BFO authors, presumably as a result of recent work to establish BFO as an ISO standard.

Thanks,

Nick

Received on Sunday, 8 December 2019 20:48:16 UTC