- From: martin <martin@ics.forth.gr>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:20:20 +0300
- To: public-prov-comments@w3.org
We use the RDF language TRIG to define named graphs. Currently, all important triple stores and RDF-enabled graph databases support the concept as "contexts" or whatever. As implementation, it works exactly as you expect. We have implemented in this way argumentation and annotation models. Even though theory is somehow lagging behind, if you use Named Graphs only for instance level for reification, it works well, and has the advantage that you keep related triples in the context of reference. Best, Martin On 10/12/2017 6:59 PM, Svensson, Lars wrote: > Hi Olaf, > > On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 9:58 PM, Olaf Hartig [mailto:olaf.hartig@liu.se] wrote: >> To: public-prov-comments@w3.org >> There is another approach that we are currently working on. It goes by the >> name RDF* and SPARQL*. The basic idea is to allow for nesting of triples and, >> similarly, nesting of triple patterns in queries. Find a short, 4-pages >> description of the proposal and of our initial results in the following >> document: >> >> http://olafhartig.de/files/Hartig_ISWC2017_RDFStarPosterPaper.pdf >> >> The document also includes pointers to more detailed documents. >> >> Let me know if you have any questions about it. > Thanks, I shall look closely at it and then come back to you. I'm out of office next week so please bear with me that it will take a few days... > > Best, > > Lars > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 | Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 | | Email: martin@ics.forth.gr | | Center for Cultural Informatics | Information Systems Laboratory | Institute of Computer Science | Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, | GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | --------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 10:20:56 UTC