- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:56:35 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C Prov <public-prov-comments@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAExK0DfJNN5DfYpsrUBNZ8nFJxNxbnRZ4dnfZiddjeqVCS3+pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Luc, I understand. However, prov:generatedAtTime was introduced as a shortcut function. I have seen it widely used by people adopting PROV in order to avoid having to use blank nodes or qualified terms. It is also used in the prov-dc direct mappings for mapping dct:created, dct:dateAccepted, dct:dateCopyRighted, dct:dateSubmitted, dct:issued and dct:modified. That document was reviewed and accepted by the group. If we now remove this relationship, it will create inconsistencies with the PROV-DC document. And it will introduce inconsistencies with the people who have extended and adopted PROV. I think it is better to have prov:generatedAtTime as redundant shortcut property rather than remove it. Best, Daniel 2015-07-01 16:38 GMT+02:00 Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>: > Hi Daniel, > > We don't have formal mappings between our representations. So, I am not > sure there is an authoritative > answer. > > Looking at activities, in prov-n, we can write: > activity(a,2001-10-26T21:32:52,2001-10-26T21:32:53) > This corresponds to > a prov:startedAtTime 2001-10-26T21:32:52. > a prov:endedAtTime 2001-10-26T21:32:53. > > For entities, we don't have time information allowed in prov-n: > > entity(e) > > Instead, wasGeneratedBy(e,-,2001-10-26T21:32:52) can be translated using > the qualitifed pattern. > > e prov:hadQualifiedGeneration [ prov:atTime 2001-10-26T21:32:52] > > > Luc > > > > On 01/07/2015 15:27, Daniel Garijo wrote: > > Hi Luc, > I am sorry, but I must be missing something here. > generatedAt time (Entity->dateTime) is an attribute of Entity. > atTime (InstantaneousEvent ->dateTime) is an attirbute of Generation, > among others like End or Start. > > Example 20 in Prov-DM ( > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/Overview.html#anexample-generation2) > states that "wasGeneratedBy(e, -, 2001-10-26T21:32:52)" is valid. And that > is equivalent to "e prov:generatedAtTime 2001-10-26T21:32:52", right? > > I still fail to see where the issue is :( > Daniel > > 2015-07-01 16:10 GMT+02:00 Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Time is an attribute of generation, not of entity, as it currently stands. >> >> Luc >> >> >> On 01/07/2015 15:04, Daniel Garijo wrote: >> >> Hi Tim, >> are you suggesting to delete prov:generatedAtTime?? >> Example 20 in PROV-DM shows how to do the equivalent thing with DM: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-dm-20130430/Overview.html#anexample-generation2 >> >> I think this was a very useful property for stating the creation time of >> an entity without having to qualify the generation term. >> It is also used in the prov-dc mapping. I don't understand why this is >> an issue. >> Best, >> Daniel >> >> 2015-07-01 15:37 GMT+02:00 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>: >> >>> Please note a recent addition to the PROV Errata [1] regarding >>> PROV-O’s generation and invalidation time properties, copied below. >>> The entry resolves issue [2]. >>> >>> Thanks to Luc and his team for pointing out the disparity. >>> Thanks to Ivan for publishing the revised Errata document. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>> Error o-5 <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/errata.html#o-5>, generation >>> and invalidation time properties have no equivalent in prov-dm >>> >>> in (22) Property: prov:generatedAtTime >>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#generatedAtTime> and in (27) Property: >>> prov:invalidatedAtTime <http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#invalidatedAtTime>, >>> prov:generatedAtTime and prov:invalidatedAtTime properties should not be >>> defined because they have no equivalent in prov-dm and thus no equivalent >>> in other PROV serializations. >>> >>> (22) Property: prov:generatedAtTime >>> >>> IRI:http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#generatedAtTime >>> >>> (27) Property: prov:invalidatedAtTime >>> >>> IRI:http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#invalidatedAtTime >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/errata.html#o-5 >>> [2] https://github.com/timrdf/prov-wg/issues/4 >>> >>> Timothy Lebo >>> lebot@rpi.edu >>> https://impactstory.org/TimothyLebo >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Head of the Web and Internet Science Group >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton twitter: @lucmoreau >> Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Head of the Web and Internet Science Group > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton twitter: @lucmoreau > Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 14:57:06 UTC