Hi Jacco
It's a good idea.
We've set-up an FAQ to do this [1] . It's on the semantic web wiki which is
editable after the length of the working group. We hope to spruce it up
after we get through proposed rec, etc. Feel free to edit it if you want :-)
Thanks for using PROV!
Paul
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Jacco van Ossenbruggen <
Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Jacco.
> >
> > I can offer one way to model what you describe.
>
> …
>
> > The key is that the Bundle was generated by the Activity of executing
> the workflow, and the Activity's Association had a Plan that was followed
> to perform the Activity.
>
> …
>
> Thanks Tim, this approach actually works out very nice in my case. I'm
> gonna use this!
>
> I think that for a widespread adoption of PROV, it would be extremely
> useful if the WG could setup a page (e.g. on the wiki) with some kind of
> cookbook or catalog of design patters with PROV solutions to common
> problems. See also the discussion on scruffy versus neat prov modelling,
> e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Oct/0225.html.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jacco
>