- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:53:33 +0100
- To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJCyKRpqE-pamf3Vwq3afAJvKUR7HwCNW1+tz-ua6kO4tjf3zw@mail.gmail.com>
Great. Thanks Jacco Paul On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jacco van Ossenbruggen < Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl> wrote: > Dear Paul, > > The response fully addresses my original concerns. > > In fact, I like the final outcome much more than the change I proposed > in my original email. > So I would like to thank the WG for their extensive explanation and > the proposed changes to the data model document. > > Jacco > > > On 27 Oct 2012, at 10:27, Paul Groth wrote: > > > Hi Jacco, > > > > Thanks for your input on prov. You had a question about the > > definition of Entity. You can see the original email here: > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Jul/0009.html > > > > We have carefully considered your comment and have proposed some > > changes. You can see our full response here: > > > > 1.1.38 ISSUE-462 (Definition of Entity) > > > > As part of the W3C process, we need to get an acknowledgement from > > you that either our response addresses your comment or if not why. > > > > Thanks again for your interest in PROV. > > > > Paul > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > > Assistant Professor > > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | > > Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science > > - The Network Institute > > VU University Amsterdam > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science - The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 07:54:07 UTC