- From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:39:22 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: public-prov-comments@w3.org
Dear Paul, The response fully addresses my original concerns. In fact, I like the final outcome much more than the change I proposed in my original email. So I would like to thank the WG for their extensive explanation and the proposed changes to the data model document. Jacco On 27 Oct 2012, at 10:27, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Jacco, > > Thanks for your input on prov. You had a question about the > definition of Entity. You can see the original email here: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Jul/0009.html > > We have carefully considered your comment and have proposed some > changes. You can see our full response here: > > 1.1.38 ISSUE-462 (Definition of Entity) > > As part of the W3C process, we need to get an acknowledgement from > you that either our response addresses your comment or if not why. > > Thanks again for your interest in PROV. > > Paul > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group | > Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 07:39:59 UTC