- From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:12:32 +0000
- To: Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel@gmail.com>
- Cc: Nala Ginrut <mulei@gnu.org>, public-privacy@w3.org
On 21/02/2020 16:39, Matthew Finkel wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org> wrote: >> Nala Ginrut wrote on 20/02/2020 13:52: >>> Hi Maciej Stachowiak and all contributors! >>> Thanks for all the work! >>> I'd like to share some comments here: >>> >>> 1. "Benign information disclosure..system preferences [like dark mode]" >>> Do we really care about that someone may know what theme we are using? >> While avoiding saying outright that this is the case here ... *If* it is >> a way of fingerprinting or identifying, when used with a combination of >> other accessibility related changes in the browser, >> that the person may have a disability. Then I would say yes. >> >> Many will use dark mode, just because they like it and not have any >> accessibility need, and they may not stick out from the herd etc but >> this information when used in conjunction with other unique >> configuration settings such as a larger font site, particular font >> usage/symbol sets etc may be used to identify users with disabilities. > "Yes, but...". I'll make a stronger statement and say "user > customizable preferences should either 1) not cause a reduction in the user's > privacy, or 2) explicitly warn users if adjusting that setting will reduce > their privacy". +1. Also note it would be just weird if turning on some a11y customisation did have the unwanted side affect of compromising their privacy. But this is what we need to make sure doesn't happen. Weirder if they were told this was the case beforehand. Thanks Josh > For this specific case, if a user adjusts their chrome/browser > theme such that it uses a "dark theme" instead of a "light theme", and this > adjustment does not modify any part of a site's content, then this should have > zero privacy implications. I don't know how Chrome's content dark mode is > implemented, so that may change a browser's fingerprint. > > Similarly, I would like to live in a world where adding (something like) a > "Bookmarks toolbar" in the chrome doesn't change a browser's fingerprint, but > something simple like this has real implications right now. -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Friday, 21 February 2020 18:11:24 UTC