Re: Questions regarding the review of an external specification

Thanks Jeffrey.

I’ve just updated agenda accordingly and circulated it on the email list.

Christine

> On Jun 16, 2020, at 7:31 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Also, sending a link to the spec ahead of the meeting is helpful. :)
> 
> Jeffrey
> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 10:53 AM Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
> Hi Alexandra,
> 
> (And thank you Tess).
> 
> As it happens, we have our next PING call this Thursday 18 June 2020 at UTC 16. If you are able to join the call, a good place to bring up this question would be under the agenda item about new Web developments and privacy considerations. If you need the call coordinates, please let me know.
> 
> Christine
> 
> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Theresa O'Connor <hober@apple.com> wrote:
> > 
> > +PING
> > 
> > Hi Alexandra,
> > 
> > You wrote, to public-privacycg:
> > 
> >> Would it be appropriate to request that you review a non-W3C
> >> specification?
> > 
> > The Privacy CG isn't the group at W3C which does privcy reviews. The
> > Privacy Interest Group (PING) is, though, and it wouldn't surprise me if
> > they'd be happy to take a look. Their mailing list is
> > public-privacy@w3.org. I've CCed them on this reply.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tess
> > 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2020 13:24:00 UTC