Re: Questions regarding the review of an external specification

Also, sending a link to the spec ahead of the meeting is helpful. :)

Jeffrey

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 10:53 AM Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:

> Hi Alexandra,
>
> (And thank you Tess).
>
> As it happens, we have our next PING call this Thursday 18 June 2020 at
> UTC 16. If you are able to join the call, a good place to bring up this
> question would be under the agenda item about new Web developments and
> privacy considerations. If you need the call coordinates, please let me
> know.
>
> Christine
>
> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Theresa O'Connor <hober@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > +PING
> >
> > Hi Alexandra,
> >
> > You wrote, to public-privacycg:
> >
> >> Would it be appropriate to request that you review a non-W3C
> >> specification?
> >
> > The Privacy CG isn't the group at W3C which does privcy reviews. The
> > Privacy Interest Group (PING) is, though, and it wouldn't surprise me if
> > they'd be happy to take a look. Their mailing list is
> > public-privacy@w3.org. I've CCed them on this reply.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tess
> >
>
>
>