- From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:01:22 -0400
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu>
- Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
On 9/24/19 5:09 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > The Formal Objection was in regards to the IG charter. In particular, we > asked that a formal deliverable be added to formalize the model of privacy > and privacy threats. Jeffrey's proposal can be a good starting point for > that, certainly, but I think this should work like the TAG's Design > Principles - it's a living guidance document, and it should make it clear > what is being assessed by the PING review process. If new types of privacy > concerns arise, they should be added to the document. > > I'm afraid I can't comment on the resolution (or not) of the FO, as it's > being addressed by the W3C in member-confidential space (and this is a > public mailing list). The only comment I'd make at this point is that I > don't think this should impede any work the IG is currently doing, and I > expect this to get resolved in fairly short order. Thanks Chris, As W3C seeks to work by consensus, and indeed the requested Threat Model deliverable matches one PING agreed to adopt at its TPAC meetings, I've proposed a pull request to the charter draft[1] to add that reference in the charter. If others who reviewed the charter agree with this change, then we'd take the whole thing to the Director. In the meantime, I've requested an extension to the current charter as a buffer. It's great to see all the energy around privacy at TPAC, and I look forward to working together to improve the web's privacy for users. Thanks, --Wendy [1] https://github.com/w3cping/administrivia/pull/27 > [remainder trimmed] -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Strategy Lead and Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) https://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2019 23:01:25 UTC