> But I would be happy to help with the document. Very glad to get your help. Thanks a lot! Kind Regards Kepeng -------------------------- 发件人:<lkasz.olejnik@gmail.com> 日期：9月17日 00:17 添加收件人David Singer<singer@apple.com> 输入主题Re: Privacy protection principles 2016-09-16 16:44 GMT+01:00 David Singer <singer@apple.com>: > On Sep 16, 2016, at 8:03 , Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote: > > (waits for David Singer to chime in on the vagaries of PII, personal > information, personal data, etc.) LOL. Somewhere I picked up the acronym PDI — Personally Derived Information — and I kinda like it. Given enough information deriving from a personal interaction, you end up knowing something about a person, and they can become identifiable. Indeed. Clear distinction for PII and strictlly-non-PII is apparently going into history. What is especially interesting is that - perhaps non-PII data today, might become PII tomorrow (after more is known, research is made, regulations are changed...)... That's why I'm not so much concerned with distilling a strict and static list of PIIs. But I would be happy to help with the document. > > It might be time to have some loya jirga (big discussion) to > standardize or describe these terms for use in w3c? At CDT we tend to > default to -- what I associate with European data protection > regulation -- "personal data". > > Will be great to see many of you next week! > Very much looking forward to it. Travel safely! A shame I'm not there. Hopefully another time! Best LukaszReceived on Sunday, 18 September 2016 16:47:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:49:33 UTC