Re: revocation requirement (was Re: Comments/Questions on Media Capture Streams – Privacy and Security Considerations) from Martin Thomson on 2015-10-29 (public-privacy@w3.org from October to December 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:19:56 +0900
To: Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXkMetRYOssd6++Tij3rWJZ5e0Q5Y7-0nboJPsR--oC-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 29 October 2015 at 15:15, Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote:
> If, to comply with that, we should add a requirement to
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch for revocation, which it sounds like
> implementing browsers already support, just let us know where to send the
> pull request.

I think that mediacapture is a more reasonable place to house that
sort of requirement.

Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 06:20:30 UTC