To be clear, I'm not against persistent permissions, for precisely the reasons that Martin indicated at the very top of this thread. I do, however, think that Firefox's UI of giving the user the choice to be persistent or not is better than Chrome's UI of just giving persistent permissions without a user prompt, I can understand that there are arguments on the other side. -Ekr On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 October 2015 at 11:46, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > > On Thursday 29 October 2015 11:07:38 Martin Thomson wrote: > >> On 29 October 2015 at 10:13, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > >> > Not in privacy > >> > >> Yes in privacy. > > > > Depends on what you understand by "persistent". Maybe we are not even > > disagreeing. > > Persistent for me is what Chrome does, or what Firefox does when you > pick the "Always" option. Maybe you could explain what you think > persistent might mean other than that. > >
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 04:33:47 UTC