W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: PING [call for consensus] - publish fingerprinting guidance as a Working Draft Interest Group Note

From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:35:14 +0900
Message-ID: <CABzCy2Bjx7GQvzAmYc-cfSScbY0c8061gbJfMpGz1QOcAvjU2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
I am fine with publishing it.

Re: first NOTE in the document, i.e., identification and correlation,
generally speaking, I have an impression that identification is an
inter-temporal correlation within a site, and "correlation" is the case
where cross-site/domain correlation is possible in addition. At least,
that's how I explain the pseudonymity and verinymity.
(Anonymity is such a state that even the inter-temporal correlation is not
possible.)

Best,

Nat

2015-10-19 22:54 GMT+09:00 Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>:

> On 10/19/2015 09:45 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> > Hi Christine,
> >
> > would it be useful to finish the document before calling consensus? At
> > least the version I opened had lots of open issues in there.
>
> As a general matter of W3C Process, it's OK to publish a WD with open
> issues. Consensus to publish a Working Draft is an acknowledgment that
> the work is in-scope and it's worth raising to a wider audience for
> comment. Editing continues to close the issues and reach consensus on a
> complete document for final publication, in this case as an IG Note.
>
> --Wendy
>
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes
> >
> >
> > On 10/19/2015 03:38 PM, Christine Runnegar wrote:
> >> Dear PING members,
> >>
> >> We have been discussing for some time the possibility of publishing the
> Unofficial Draft Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors [1]
> as a W3C Working Draft Group Note with a view to publishing the final
> version as an Interest Group Note. Those who have expressed views so far
> have supported this approach. However, we would like to formally announce a
> call for consensus.
> >>
> >> Statements of support, statements of objections and additional comments
> are all welcome. Specific feedback on the document is also welcome.
> >>
> >> The status of the document would be Draft Interest Group Note.
> >>
> >> The call for consensus will remain open until 1 November 2015 UTC 23:99.
> >>
> >> Next steps:
> >>
> >> Please express your views on this email list in reply to this thread.
> >>
> >> Assuming consensus is achieved, [1] will be published as a Working
> Draft Interest Group Note on the W3C website.
> >>
> >> We would then issue a formal call for review.
> >>
> >> Christine and Tara
> >>
> >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/fingerprinting-guidance/
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office)
> Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> http://wendy.seltzer.org/        +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
>
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 14:35:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:49:31 UTC