- From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:35:14 +0900
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABzCy2Bjx7GQvzAmYc-cfSScbY0c8061gbJfMpGz1QOcAvjU2g@mail.gmail.com>
I am fine with publishing it. Re: first NOTE in the document, i.e., identification and correlation, generally speaking, I have an impression that identification is an inter-temporal correlation within a site, and "correlation" is the case where cross-site/domain correlation is possible in addition. At least, that's how I explain the pseudonymity and verinymity. (Anonymity is such a state that even the inter-temporal correlation is not possible.) Best, Nat 2015-10-19 22:54 GMT+09:00 Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>: > On 10/19/2015 09:45 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Hi Christine, > > > > would it be useful to finish the document before calling consensus? At > > least the version I opened had lots of open issues in there. > > As a general matter of W3C Process, it's OK to publish a WD with open > issues. Consensus to publish a Working Draft is an acknowledgment that > the work is in-scope and it's worth raising to a wider audience for > comment. Editing continues to close the issues and reach consensus on a > complete document for final publication, in this case as an IG Note. > > --Wendy > > > > > Ciao > > Hannes > > > > > > On 10/19/2015 03:38 PM, Christine Runnegar wrote: > >> Dear PING members, > >> > >> We have been discussing for some time the possibility of publishing the > Unofficial Draft Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors [1] > as a W3C Working Draft Group Note with a view to publishing the final > version as an Interest Group Note. Those who have expressed views so far > have supported this approach. However, we would like to formally announce a > call for consensus. > >> > >> Statements of support, statements of objections and additional comments > are all welcome. Specific feedback on the document is also welcome. > >> > >> The status of the document would be Draft Interest Group Note. > >> > >> The call for consensus will remain open until 1 November 2015 UTC 23:99. > >> > >> Next steps: > >> > >> Please express your views on this email list in reply to this thread. > >> > >> Assuming consensus is achieved, [1] will be published as a Working > Draft Interest Group Note on the W3C website. > >> > >> We would then issue a formal call for review. > >> > >> Christine and Tara > >> > >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/fingerprinting-guidance/ > >> > > > > > -- > Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) > Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile) > > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Chairman, OpenID Foundation http://nat.sakimura.org/ @_nat_en
Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 14:35:43 UTC