W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > July to September 2015

Fingerprinting guidance update; responding to feedback, Note publication?

From: Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:58:13 -0700
Message-Id: <D55C54C5-F644-49C9-941D-2E19B2DD8764@w3.org>
To: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
I've revised the Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Specification Authors text, responding as best I can to comments from the TAG, the Tor Browser folks and other comments via mailing list.


Changes in particular include:
* moving feasibility question up earlier, emphasizing realism/pessimism
* clarifying some of the best practices, regarding unnecessary additions to fingerprinting surface
* additional examples and references (in particular, to the TAG finding on unsanctioned tracking)
* filling in to-do sections (and marking remaining ones with issue boxes)

To clarify the status of this document and to gather wider review, I think it would be useful to publish this as a draft Interest Group Note. As a Process matter, that would consist of: the Interest Group deciding we want to publish it as an Interest Group Note; getting confirmation from the domain lead that we can use this name/shortname; publishing a snapshot on w3.org indicating its status as a draft Note; asking chairs and other groups for feedback.

And in any case, I'd welcome further feedback, additions, subtractions and the like. I get the impression that specific examples from different specs/Working Groups would be the most welcome addition.


Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 01:58:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:49:30 UTC