Re: Geofencing and privacy

Is that a publicly-available ISO standard? If not, we're likely to
ignore it if we have to pay to look at it. best, Joe

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Ambarish S Natu
<ambarish.natu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Please excuse me, if i am being a bit naive here in my comments. ISO/IEC
> 29100 and ISO/IEC 29101 specify a privacy framework/architecture for ICT
> systems, which I believe encompasses the work of the W3. Has W3 thought
> about addressing these aspects of PII as their design principles. I do not
> see a normative reference to this work done by ISO/IEC.
>
> Regards
> Ambarish
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:48 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 24, 2015, at 7:35 , Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all.
>> >
>> > The First Public Working Draft of Geofencing API has been published by
>> > the Geolocation WG:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-geofencing-20150604/
>> >
>> > You will see that there is still work to be done on the privacy and
>> > security considerations section.
>> >
>> > So, here is an opportunity to provide some early guidance.
>>
>> I don’t want to sound excessively negative, but I have a hard time
>> believing you can design any aspect of this without solving how you are
>> going to handle the very hard privacy considerations.  The mechanics of the
>> design seem a lot simpler, and are likely to be heavily affected.
>>
>>
>> David Singer
>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Ambarish S Natu
> www.angelfire.com/ak4/ambarishnatuatunsw/1_page.htm



-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
1634 I ST NW STE 1100
Washington DC 20006-4011
(p) 202-407-8825
(f) 202-637-0968
joe@cdt.org
PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 13:49:16 UTC