- From: <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:11:21 -0400
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
I share the concerns expressed by Rigo and others, however if this: > The proposed scope of the PUA CG is very narrow and will focus only > on the technical issues involved in identifying and addressing the leaks > at the UA and trying to mitigate loss of functionality caused by any > restrictions. were expressed as a program to identify the mechanism(s) by which state is shared, with an intent to specify a no-(covert)-shared-state UA I would be less concerned. My preference is to avoid jurisdictionally, even ideologically scoped terms of which "privacy" is a wicked good example. Eric
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 01:20:27 UTC