- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:15:59 -0400
- To: ext Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- CC: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Hi All, On 9/12/12 3:19 AM, ext Christine Runnegar wrote: > This was one of the issues we discussed at our last call - how to usefully help other W3C WGs identify and address potential privacy concerns during the standards development process. As you point out, as early as possible is preferable. It certainly helps if PING members are already participating in the other WGs. > > I think there are many people in PING willing to help so it is more a question of how to constructively contribute that expertise. I agree early review would be best, perhaps as early as the First Public Working Draft (FPWD). FPWD publications are announced on the Member-only [chairs] list as well as the Public [w3c-annouce] list. Perhaps some set of PING members can commit to review these documents for relevant issues (and notify the IG accordingly)? (Ideally, a WG that publishes a FPWD would engage directly this IG if it knows about issues within the scope of this IG. However, it may be the case that WG don't have the "right" expertise.) -AB [chairs] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/ [w3c-annouce] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-announce/
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 14:16:23 UTC