- From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:07:35 -0700
- To: Mark Lizar <info@smartspecies.com>
- Cc: Malcolm Crompton <mcrompton@iispartners.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, public-privacy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTin-_R75AML=NN8juvmf3YaxpmQXtA@mail.gmail.com>
How is that different from what P3P attempted? On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Mark Lizar <info@smartspecies.com> wrote: > These are good points. > > As well, all symptoms I believe of a lack of a simple standard in notice. > Needed to provide a common(universal) location and structure for notices > to be read, discovered and made accessible. > > As a result every Enterprise needs to push notices to people limiting the > ability for people to pull notice and manage notices on aggregate. > > We run into this issue with informed consent online. Something I view as > a specific type of two-way (or bilateral) notice. Right now there are way > too many notices. > > Consent notices (the primary online control tool) causes friction between > enterprise and users causing high drop out rates online. One approach where > a notice standard could reduce the amount of notices could be: if a user > could tag a consent notice (or opt iin/out) with an identifier and link it > for administration later. The development of notices for consent and > especially informed consent for management post consent provision would be a > way to reduce notices and increase their value. Providing an increase in > usability of controls online. > > Maybe notices for control of information need to be standardised so that > the number of notices can be reduced and the quality and clarity of notice > can be increased? > > > > > On 21 Apr 2011, at 12:59, Malcolm Crompton wrote: > > All good points, but it misses a long running issue rapidly emerging into >> prominence from the recent spate of industry offerings to consumers to >> give >> them some control - the sum of all these different notices and controls >> from >> lots of apps and platforms etc is overwhelming and does not come together >> in >> a way that the ordinary user is going to understand or have time to get >> across. See the following URL for quite a good exposition of the issues: >> >> >> http://abine.com/wordpress/http:/abine.com/wordpress/2011/choosing-internet- >> privacy-software-comparing-your-options/ >> >> >> Malcolm Crompton >> >> Managing Director >> Information Integrity Solutions Pty Ltd >> ABN 78 107 611 898 >> >> T: +61 407 014 450 >> >> MCrompton@iispartners.com >> www.iispartners.com >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-privacy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-privacy-request@w3.org >> ] >> On Behalf Of Rigo Wenning >> Sent: Thursday, 21 April 2011 9:39 PM >> To: Mark Lizar >> Cc: public-privacy@w3.org >> Subject: Re: oo.apple.com >> >> On Thursday 21 April 2011 13:29:12 Mark Lizar wrote: >> >>> What is required is an open standard for notices online so that >>> signalling of tracking and other policies can always be discoverable, >>> accessible technically. An application (or in this case Apple Iphone) >>> could then always link via a standard in notice to a common place and >>> location for layered notices to any one application, service, >>> Enterprise and perhaps with some significant collaboration how they >>> apply in context. >>> >> >> This could be suggested to the DAP Working Group IMHO. Some kind of >> notification infrastructure is definitely needed whether we talk about >> informed consent (EU) or notice & choice (US). >> >> Best, >> >> Rigo >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 13:08:03 UTC