- From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:08:55 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- CC: "public-privacy@w3.org" <public-privacy@w3.org>
We must first determine what it means by do not track. At a high-level if a company is asked to provide everything they have on a certain individual that is on a do-not-track list they should not be able to return anything except logs required to fulfill certain transactions as required by law. JC -----Original Message----- From: public-privacy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-privacy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Singer Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:00 AM To: Rigo Wenning Cc: public-privacy@w3.org Subject: Re: do not track list? Yes. There is a big difference. If I am on a 'do not call' list and someone calls me, I know. If I am on a 'do not track' list, how do I know if people are complying? On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:02 , Rigo Wenning wrote: > Hi all, > > in > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/business/media/10privacy.html?pagewanted=all&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=a26 > > there is a suggestion to have "do not tracking" lists following > the example of the "do not call" lists. They imagine a browser > button or a button on the page. > > This looks like something where a discussion with technical folks > would be beneficial for the regulators. > > Best, > > Rigo > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 16:09:33 UTC