Re: Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology


This is awesome, something that is very much needed.

I am wondering if there is scope in this document to define the  
difference between trusted IDM technology, and the Trustworthy  
practices of an institution.  Seems to be a large gap here in the use  
of the word trust that is significant.

On 11 Aug 2010, at 11:42, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:

> Hi all,
> we have just submitted a new version of the privacy and identity  
> management terminology document:
> The full document titel is "Terminology for Talking about Privacy by  
> Data Minimization: Anonymity, Unlinkability, Undetectability,  
> Unobservability, Pseudonymity, and Identity Management" and here is  
> the abstract:
>    This document is an attempt to consolidate terminology in the field
>    privacy by data minimization.  It motivates and develops  
> definitions
>    for anonymity/identifiability, (un)linkability, (un)detectability,
>    (un)observability, pseudonymity, identity, partial identity,  
> digital
>    identity and identity management.  Starting the definitions from  
> the
>    anonymity and unlinkability perspective and not from a definition  
> of
>    identity (the latter is the obvious approach to some people)  
> reveals
>    some deeper structures in this field.
> Please let us know whether the terminology is useful and complete.  
> Your input is highly appreciated!
> Ciao
> Hannes

Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 16:21:43 UTC