- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@antenna.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:09:21 +0000
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
LatinReq should list more sources for more of its recommendations, but that background material should not be in the document itself. Something like the 'Talk' tabs in Wikipedia, perhaps, where it's possible to compare and contrast different sources to give a better idea of why something is recommended. I was recently looking at material on hyphenation, so I also looked at hyphenation parameters [1] in LatinReq. It lists several possible parameters and some Prince-specific property names for some of them. Except XSL-FO has essentially identical properties, and I'd also been looking in 'Book Typography' by Mitchell and Wightman, which includes: Hyphenation is controlled in the paragraph style window by setting the shortest word to be divided, together with a lower limit of characters before and after the hyphen. The number of hyphens allowed in successive lines is also set. Too many hyphens in a row is irritating to the reader. I would be unsurprised if troff had something similar. [2] I would expect it in TeX, too. More background material would give a better grounding in the reasons for the recommendations than at present. A lot of background material would swamp the actual recommendations, so it would be better to have the background material outside of the LatinReq document. Regards, Tony. [1] https://w3c.github.io/dpub-pagination/#parameters-for-hyphenation [2] Expressed, no doubt, as a '.' followed by three-or-so characters, unlike those markup languages where terseness is of minimal importance.
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2021 17:09:39 UTC