RE: Position on further standardisation of XSL-FO?

Kevin,

On Wed, February 19, 2014 8:03 pm, Kevin Brown wrote:
> RenderX would both welcome and work with W3C or any Community Group for
> further development of XSL FO.

Thank you for your reply.  The Print and Page Layout Community Group would
likewise welcome participation by RenderX.

As RenderX is a W3C member, if you or anyone from RenderX would like to
join the CG, please see the "If you work for a W3C Member" section of the
"How do I join a group?" page [1].

The most current work by the CG is the extension functions [2] for Saxon
and Xalan for running FOP or Antenna House from within the XSLT processor
to get an area tree, and it would be a bonus to be able to complement the
current extensions with the ability to do the same with RenderX.

Beyond that, you, as with every member, would be welcome to participate in
or provide ideas for the future work of the CG as we act on the results of
the recent survey [3].

Regards,


Tony Graham                                         tgraham@mentea.net
Consultant                                       http://www.mentea.net
Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C    XML Guild member
  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --
Mentea       XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming

[1] http://www.w3.org/community/question/how-do-i-join-a-group/
[2] https://www.w3.org/community/ppl/wiki/XSLTExtensions
[3] http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/2014/01/28/survey-results/

Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 21:46:56 UTC