- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:58:27 -0000 (GMT)
- To: sales@ecrion.com, sales@renderx.com, sales@antennahouse.com, info@alt-soft.com, info@assentis.com, sales@xmlpdf.com, info@compart.com, info@inventivedesigners.com, info@xslfast.com, mktg@altova.com
- Cc: public-ppl@w3.org
Your organisation makes and sells software based partially or exclusively on XSL-FO, yet the W3C XML Print and Page Layout Working Group, which was developing XSL-FO 2.0, did not have its charter renewed in 2013 because of insufficient participation [1], leaving no path for further development of the standard on which your software is based. The Print and Page Layout Community Group at W3C [2] recently ran a survey [4] about what it should do next. The results of that showed a strong level of support from people both inside and outside the CG for further development of XSL-FO specifications, either as XSL-FO 2.0, a XSL-FO 1.2, or as modules layered on top of XSL 1.1. Do you and your organisation have a position on the further standardisation of XSL-FO at the W3C or elsewhere, as a Community Group, Business Group [3], or full Working Group? Please include public-ppl@w3.org in any reply. Regards, Tony Graham tgraham@mentea.net Consultant http://www.mentea.net Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C XML Guild member -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Mentea XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/ [2] http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/ [3] http://www.w3.org/community/about/ [4] http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/2014/01/28/survey-results/
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 15:58:54 UTC