Re: Where we headed?

On 4 June 2013 19:31, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote:
> On Tue, June 4, 2013 2:01 pm, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>> On 4.6.2013 2:40, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Truth be told, since XSLT is declarative and works well in this
>>> space, I am convinced that an bettter FO formatter would actually be
>>> written in something like F# or Scheme or Haskell.
>
> Back in the early 1990s, Uniscope had a transformation language for SGML
> written in Scheme and a Scheme preprocessor and TeX macros for formatting.

Joe Armstrong uses \tex for his formatting, so I guess he understands
the suitability of Erlang for this job?
  He looked at FO and rejected it.

regards



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 06:57:48 UTC