- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:00:18 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On Tue, February 12, 2013 2:46 pm, Liam R E Quin wrote: > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 14:21 +0000, Tony Graham wrote: >> Since the XPPL WG is/was a closed group, we would strictly >> speaking need Liam or someone within the W3C to make the last >> draft public and/or bless our use of it > > Go ahead, but you and Dave need to check in any changes to CVS that you > might have made since the last public draft. Thanks. That counts as sufficient go-ahead to me. >> and we'd need the >> infrastructure maintainers to make a Mercurial repository for >> us. > I'm not sure about this one; I'll try and find out today; I'm in a > Workshop so might take a couple of days. It's offered at http://www.w3.org/community/about/tool/ > It would also be a good idea to see if developers from Antenna House, > RenderX, FOP, are watching (I know that Inventive Designers and xmlroff > are here!). In other words, who is likely to implement anything that is Also FOP. > done here? That is the crux of the problem. I guess another prerequisite is user expectation that XSL-FO can do whatever we spec, so that users can pressure vendors to implement it. In a recent conversation with a vendor, I was told that their users had never asked for or about upcoming features from the WD. Regards, Tony.
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 15:00:45 UTC