- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:10:30 +0000
- To: "public-ppl@w3.org" <public-ppl@w3.org>
On 10 February 2013 11:59, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote: > On Sun, February 10, 2013 11:26 am, Patrick Gundlach wrote: >> I'll write something up and put it into the wiki. >> >> 1) What kind of problems do we deal in day to day work? >> 2) My layout language "specification" >> >> So we can discuss it and compare it to the requirements of XSL-FO 2.0 > and/or CSS 3 > > Thanks, that would be good food for thought. > >> Hope to be finished end of next week. > > But now that we're awake, we don't need to go back to sleep until Patrick > has put something up. Are we here to shore-up XSL 1.1 (as seemed to me to > be a concern when we started), to define common APIs, to advance XSL 2.0 > in the absence of anywhere else doing it, to try to build bridges with CSS > paged media work, or what? A concern is that, since few/no W3C members are interested, what to do with requirements/ideas for further developments? One option would be a post (long term?) from this group. What other options are there? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2013 12:10:57 UTC