Re: Active development

The next DPUB IG telecon is scheduled for January 6.

All of the technical discussion is available for public reading. If I understand correctly, IG members all receive email sent to public-digipub@w3.org by default, so you can send comments and questions to this list and IG members will see the email. There has been some confusion about the email addresses that is in the process of getting straightened out, however.

As I mentioned, I'm happy to page layout use cases to the DPUB IG for this group if the use case has gone previously undefined in that forum, and is relevant to digital publishing specifically.

-Jean

> On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:10 AM, "Tony Graham" <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, December 30, 2013 1:07 pm, Innovimax W3C wrote:
>> ...
>> Either we are interested in printing or in paged media. We could of course
>> do both, but it seems dpub is more the place to be
>> http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Main_Page)
> 
> We might be interested in digital publishing, but the IG is not interested
> in us.  The DPUB IG is "currently focused on getting more publishing
> companies to join" [1].  They accept comments on public-digipub@w3.org
> [2], but technical discussion happens on public-digipub-ig@w3.org, to
> which only IG members can post.  E.g., there's been discussions this month
> about 'footnotes and columns' and about 'lists, outline lists' [3].  There
> was a suggestion from Richard Ishida that technical discussion happen on
> the public-digipub@w3.org list [4], but AFAICT, that hasn't been
> discussed, probably not least since they haven't had a telcon since
> Richard posted his message (on public-digipub@w3.org).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Tony.
> 
> [1] As I was told when I was declined as an Invited Expert.
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub/
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013Dec/thread.html
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub/2013Dec/0006.html
> 
>

Received on Monday, 30 December 2013 16:15:25 UTC