- From: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:09:10 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On Mon, December 30, 2013 1:07 pm, Innovimax W3C wrote: ... > Either we are interested in printing or in paged media. We could of course > do both, but it seems dpub is more the place to be > http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Main_Page) We might be interested in digital publishing, but the IG is not interested in us. The DPUB IG is "currently focused on getting more publishing companies to join" [1]. They accept comments on public-digipub@w3.org [2], but technical discussion happens on public-digipub-ig@w3.org, to which only IG members can post. E.g., there's been discussions this month about 'footnotes and columns' and about 'lists, outline lists' [3]. There was a suggestion from Richard Ishida that technical discussion happen on the public-digipub@w3.org list [4], but AFAICT, that hasn't been discussed, probably not least since they haven't had a telcon since Richard posted his message (on public-digipub@w3.org). Regards, Tony. [1] As I was told when I was declined as an Invited Expert. [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub/ [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2013Dec/thread.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub/2013Dec/0006.html
Received on Monday, 30 December 2013 15:09:43 UTC