- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:45:20 +0100
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 25 April 2013 23:09, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote: > I was looking at the "W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA)" > [1] to see what Arved had got himself in for in providing the original > code and under what terms we were making the code public, but all it says > is: > > Any source code created by the Project is not subject to this > CLA, but rather subject to separate licensing terms for that > source code. > > Not very informative. > > Does that mean we need separate contributor agreements and license > assignments for software contributions? Not a lawyer, I'd interpret that as being 'what Arved attached' to the code? Choose one, put a copy to the list and all use that? GPL3 proposed. regards > > What license should we use? > > Who/what should own the copyright? > > Regards, > > > Tony. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/ > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 06:45:47 UTC