- From: Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:46:49 -0300
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
On 04/25/2013 07:09 PM, Tony Graham wrote: > I was looking at the "W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA)" > [1] to see what Arved had got himself in for in providing the original > code and under what terms we were making the code public, but all it says > is: > > Any source code created by the Project is not subject to this > CLA, but rather subject to separate licensing terms for that > source code. > > Not very informative. > > Does that mean we need separate contributor agreements and license > assignments for software contributions? > > What license should we use? > > Who/what should own the copyright? > > Regards, > > > Tony. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/ > > > As far as I am concerned when I write code that I contribute to this WG the only condition that concerns me is a requirement for users to acknowledge where they got the code from. Not from me, but the W3C PPL WG. This may apply particularly to innovative XSL/XSLT down the road. Arved
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 23:47:16 UTC