- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:00:47 +0100
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-ppl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAK2GfFBWojTFK1HOK1VcQP9fqK6naewN9pN+2pgEGhA4-VUqg@mail.gmail.com>
I'm not trying to define the end of the film here. I'm trying to gather people interested into Paginated Layout and hence we'll see how things come I thing that trying to ignore the work done by CSS is a huge mistake (the same W3C has already done with XHTML2 and WhatWG), whether we think the work done is good/finished/usable etc. So finding the good fit of each of the different attempt to solve the Print and Page Layout is a good start and seems the natural fit for a Community Group in order to find the "next step" Mohamed On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 March 2012 17:16, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > If it's about Print and Page Layout we should add at least for > completeness > > and comparison the work done in CSS > > > > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work > > > > Mohamed > > How do you see the two pieces of work merging? > That is the sticking point with many items where there isn't quite > a good overlap. > > Some places it's easy. Others less so. > > regards > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 19:01:15 UTC