Re: PROPOSED RESOLUTION (WAS Re: [Fwd: About include/excludeiripattern])

This might be an option, but I see it more as a way of defining an IRI
pattern syntax simpler than regular expressions. I'm not sure we can
still propose include/excludeiripatterns as an example of POWDER
extension, at least not referring to Unix glob patterns, which are
meant for relative / absolute paths, not for IRIs.

Andrea


On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Stasinos Konstantopoulos
<konstant@iit.demokritos.gr> wrote:
>
> why undo work that we have already done? we can simply remove the
> reference and call them Unix glob patterns or s'thing like that.
>
> s
>
>
> On Mon Jan  5 11:03:48 2009 Phil Archer said:
>
>> Given the exchange below, I'd like to a) thank Andrea for his diligence
>> in spotting this, and b) make the rather obvious proposal that we:
>>
>> Remove the in/excludeiripattern IRI constraint from POWDER (it's
>> mentioned in the grouping and formal docs).
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:32:13 +0100, Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> A long, long time ago [1], the POWDER WG had an exchange with Art
>>>> concerning WAF Access Control. The end result was that we
>>>> incorporated direct support for the same syntax in POWDER grouping
>>>> [2], i.e.
>>>>
>>>> access-item    ::= (scheme "://")? domain-pattern (":" port)? | "*"
>>>> domain-pattern ::= domain | "*." domain
>>>>
>>>> But, an eagle-eyed member of the group has spotted that the current
>>>> draft (to which we refer) does not support this any more [3].
>>>>
>>>> Do we take it that this syntax is no longer supported by your WG?
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2007Jul/0004.html
>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-grouping-20081114/#wild
>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/access-control/#syntax
>>>
>>> My apologies for not notifying your WG, I forgot there was a
>>> dependency. After thinking through the use cases we are designing for,
>>> we decided upon a much simpler model. I realize this new model not work
>>> well for you and hope you can find something that does (maybe by simply
>>> copying our old syntax).
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Phil Archer
>> w. http://philarcher.org/
>
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Andrea Perego
Dipartimento di Informatica e Comunicazione
Universita` degli Studi dell'Insubria
Via Mazzini, 5 - 21100 Varese, Italy
WWW:  http://www.dicom.uninsubria.it/~andrea.perego/
FOAF: http://www.dicom.uninsubria.it/~andrea.perego/foaf/#me
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 16:10:21 UTC