public-powderwg@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Thursday, 26 February 2009

Proposal wrt. semantic extension (was Re: Request for two new media types submitted) Phil Archer

Monday, 23 February 2009

[Fwd: [IANA #221766] Request to add describedby to Atom Link Registry [rt.amsl.com #13054]] Phil Archer

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

Re: ATOM Link Relation for "describedby" [IANA #221766] Phil Archer

Friday, 13 February 2009

New W3C role and its effect POWDER (none!) Phil Archer

Monday, 9 February 2009

Re: Comments on Nov-14 WD for ITS IG also Re: POWDER comments: multiple/alternate displaytext strings? (eg. different languages/scripts) Phil Archer
RE: Comments on Nov-14 WD for ITS IG also Re: POWDER comments: multiple/alternate displaytext strings? (eg. different languages/scripts) Yves Savourel
Use Cases covered? Phil Archer
Logical locus of POWDER extension, WAS: Request for two new media types submitted Stasinos Konstantopoulos

Thursday, 5 February 2009

Re: Status 'describedby' relationship type (was [Re: @rel type 'describedby']) Phil Archer
Request to add describedby to Atom Link Registry Phil Archer
Disposition of Last Call Comments Phil Archer
Re: Comments on Nov-14 WD for ITS IG also Re: POWDER comments: multiple/alternate displaytext strings? (eg. different languages/scripts) Phil Archer

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

Re: Status 'describedby' relationship type (was [Re: @rel type 'describedby']) Michelle Cotton

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

Re: Comments on Nov-14 WD for ITS IG also Re: POWDER comments: multiple/alternate displaytext strings? (eg. different languages/scripts) Phil Archer

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

Last message date: Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:54:21 UTC