- From: David Rooks <drooks@segala.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:51:41 +0100
- To: public-powderwg@w3.org
- Cc: parcher@fosi.org, "Smith, Kevin, VF-Group" <kevin.smith@vodafone.com>
- Message-ID: <57e42cb10809021151g3d99764cu4029d06199f551a7@mail.gmail.com>
Hmm, take the example below. I think it is pretty clear what I am trying to do and i think this should be valid. <descriptorset> <ex:wcag>AA</ex:wcag> <ex:mok>true</ex:mok> <displaytext>Everything on example.com is wcag aa and mok compliant</displaytext> <displayicon src="http://authority.example.org/wcag.png" /> <displayicon src="http://authority.example.org/mok.png" /> </descriptorset> Following on from this example - it seems reasonable to me that if more than 1 icon is acceptable then more than 1 displaytext is also acceptable. i.e. you should be able to have a displaytext for each icon you want to display. However, i can only see this working if we can associate displaytext with displayicons. This would be particularly useful in a powder application as it would allow the app to display a list of icons with some text beside each. e.g. MOK.png - everything on example.com is MOK compliant WCAG.png - everything on example.com is WCAG AA compliant ICRA.png - everything on example.com has nakedness Dave. On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) VF-Group < Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com> wrote: > I will aslo fix the schema so that validation will pick this up. > --kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: public-powderwg-request@w3.org <public-powderwg-request@w3.org> > To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org> > Sent: Tue Sep 02 11:48:19 2008 > Subject: Multiple display text/icons (treat as LC comment) > > > Ivan H has been amending his Creative Commons/SW logo copyright example > to fit in with the LC drafts and I'm just looking at it now. > > In one of his descriptor sets, Ivan has included two displaytext > elements. This is, I'm sure, an oversight, but looking at the doc [1] we > don't say that this is invalid - and the validator I'm working on > doesn't spot this. So we have two options I'd say: > > 1. Amend the text to make multiple display text (and displayicon) > elements invalid > > 2. Add a line to say that how a UA handles multiple display elements is > application-specific (it might display both or the first one, or the > last one or whatever) > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-powder-dr-20080815/#operational > > Phil. > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:52:24 UTC