- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:40:28 +0100
- To: "Smith, Kevin, ((R&D)) VF-Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
- Cc: <public-powderwg@w3.org>
On 3 Oct 2008, at 10:12, Smith, Kevin, ((R&D)) VF-Group wrote: > Good question - I had started in XSLT 1.0 but changed to XSLT 2.0 to > utilise the replace() function: the part I was having trouble with was > to ensure that a host, e.g. As I understand it (and I may be wrong), there are three flavours of POWDER: * POWDER, the easy-to-author XML format. * POWDER-BASE, identical to above, but with all the matching stuff compiled into regexps. * POWDER-S, the RDF version. Going from POWDER to POWDER-BASE or to POWDER-S may be difficult without the string processing ability of XSLT 2.0. But going from POWDER-BASE to POWDER-S should be more achievable with XSLT 1.0, as the regular expressions shouldn't need any changes. Personably I'd be happy enough with a POWDER-BASE to POWDER-S transformation in XSLT 1.0. I could hanndle POWDER to POWDER-BASE as a pre-transformation step. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 09:41:36 UTC