- From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:52:49 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Thanks Ivan, Looking at the documentation, it's clear that the /terms/ namespace is the preferred option with the older ones retained as a legacy. It's a trivial change to update the dcterms namespace in our document so unless a WG member has reason to say otherwise, we'll make that change in the next drafts. Phil. Ivan Herman wrote: > The Dublin Core initiative issued lately an updated version of their terms: > > http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ > > which seems to be a new version for the older term sets. Note that the > URI-s they use is now without version number: > > http://purl.org/dc/terms/ > > which also unifies some older terms. I just wonder whether it wouldn't > be a better way of using those URI-s both in the examples and in the > specification for OWL. (Maybe check with the DCMI people to be sure?) > > Ivan > -- Phil Archer Chief Technical Officer, Family Online Safety Institute w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 09:53:32 UTC