- From: Stasinos Konstantopoulos <konstant@iit.demokritos.gr>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:50:49 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Cc: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>, public-powderwg@w3.org, public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
On Thu Dec 18 13:52:38 2008 Phil Archer said:
> However, all the textual elements are essentially annotations and so
> need not be restricted.
Except for tags, which are datatype properties and visible to reasoners,
so due care is called for. Good news is, I tried Pellet and it didn't
blink an eye: a slight variation of DR example 2-14 where the definition
of tagset_1 goes like
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#tag" />
<owl:hasValue xml:lang="en">New Releases</owl:hasValue>
</owl:Restriction>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#tag" />
<owl:hasValue xml:lang="nl">Nieuwe Releases</owl:hasValue>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:intersectionOf>
works just fine (that is, our Semantic PP returns both wdrs:tag triples
with their xml:lang attribute).
s
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 14:52:05 UTC