- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@uninsubria.it>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:35:43 +0100
- To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
I would like again to ask for feedback about an issue which must be urgently solved, that is, how the scope of a DR is defined. The current solution is the following: 1 <owl:Class rdf:ID="ResourceOnExampleDotOrg"> 2 <owl:equivalentClass> 3 <owl:Class> 4 <rdfs:subClassOf> 5 <owl:Restriction> 6 <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="&wdr;includeHost" /> 7 <owl:hasValue>example.org</owl:hasValue> 8 </owl:Restriction> 9 </rdfs:subClassOf> 10 </owl:Class> 11 </owl:equivalentClass> 12 </owl:Class> which literally means "all the resources having a URI host component ending with example.org" (i.e., "all the resources hosted by *.example.org"). So, the question is: does anybody agree that this the correct way to define a DR scope? If it isn't, which are the alternative solutions? Andrea
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 08:31:08 UTC