Re: POWDER <-> ramm.x

Michael,

Thanks very much for this most welcome approach. I've already got a copy 
of your multimedia vocabularies on the Semantic Web XGR [1] ready to 
read, now I have even more to get my head around! Ah well, I was 
wondering what to read on the beach this year.

We do foresee POWDER working directly with RDFa so I hope there are 
indeed synergies. I've had a couple of conversations with your XG 
colleague Erik Mannens in the past on related issues and it would be 
good to pick up the conversation again.

I'll follow up with you off this list in the next few days.

Phil.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/XGR-emotion-20070710/

Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> 
> Dear POWDERs,
> 
> Ok, I might not have had the best start [1], but
> I try it again; this time it is regarding another
> issue.
> 
> We recently announced the launch of the so called
> RDFa-deployed Multimedia Metadata (ramm.x) initiative [2].
> Now I wonder what you think how POWDER relates to ramm.x; 
> I myself am not sure, but I do see synergies - we might even
> contemplate about adopting bits of the POWDER spec in ramm.x, 
> e.g., Grouping.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2007Jul/0015.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Jul/0330.html
> 
> BTW: Anyway, we put POWDER as a related technology in the according
>      section at ramm.x home (http://sw.joanneum.at/rammx/#r-how).

Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 14:33:42 UTC